被除名？被抢功劳？被送给男性？女性的名字被抹去：玛蒂尔达效应有多残忍

为什么我们总觉得女性的贡献小于男性？为什么科学史上几乎看不到女性所做的贡献，为什么传统的主导文化认为女性天生不适合从事科学职业。本期视频（玛蒂尔达效应）尝试解释这个问题。

有姐妹私信询问，把做视频参考的部分文献放这里啦，感兴趣可以看看:
[1]朱婷钰，赵万里.玛蒂尔达效应与科学界的性别不平等——基于对中国科技工作者分层状况的调查研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2017,第39卷(5): 8-18

[2]张培富，李爱花.玛蒂尔达效应:女科学家稀缺的历史困境[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,第39卷(3): 134-139

[3]Thomas Hugh Feeley;Zhuohui Yang.Is there a Matilda Effect in Communication Journals?[J].Communication Reports,2022,Vol.35(1): 1-11

[4]Rajkó, Andrea;Herendy, Csilla;Goyanes, Manuel;Demeter, Marton.The Matilda Effect in Communication Research: The Effects of Gender and Geography on Usage and Citations Across 11 Countries.[J].Communication Research,2023,: 1

[5]Shruti R Patel, Frederique St Pierre, Ana I Velazquez, Snegha Ananth, Urshila Durani, Andrea Anampa-Guzmán, Katerina Castillo, Natasha Dhawan, Amy S Oxentenko, Narjust Duma.The Matilda Effect: Under-recognition of Women in Hematology and Oncology Awards[J].The Oncologist,2021,Vol.26(9): 779-786

[6]Izquierdo-Useros, N..The Mathilde Krim Effect as a Way to Overcome the Matilda Effect(Article)[J].AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses,2018,Vol.34(9): 725-726

[7]Gliboff, Sander.Sex and the Scientific Author: M. Vaerting and the Matilda Effect in Early Twentieth‐Century Germany.[J].Gender & History,2018,Vol.30(2): 490-510

[8]Margaret W. Rossiter.The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science[J].Social Studies of Science,1993,Vol.23(2): 325-341

[9]Lincoln, Anne E.;Pincus, Stephanie;Koster, Janet Bandows;Leboy, Phoebe S..The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s.[J].Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.),2012,Vol.42(2): 307-320